Comments on YJL: Bad value X-UA-Compatible for attribute http-equiv on element meta

I edited @google-5b30530497db6704b7997bd9611ce236:...

2012-09-27T21:55:47.138-07:00

I edited @google-5b30530497db6704b7997bd9611ce236:disqus's comment, so now the PHP code is shown correctly.

I don't understand how your actually fixing it...

2012-09-27T21:42:37.103-07:00

I don't understand how your actually fixing it with that. Can you write out the full bit of code so we can see where you placed the unwanted meta tag?
I'm basically just hoping to copy paste your bit of code into the header where the meta tag would go and have it just work.

thank it work, i keep searching for eliminated err...

2011-10-25T06:52:18.343-07:00

thank it work, i keep searching for eliminated error for simple blogger template

It always is bad to do something for non-standar...

2011-09-15T19:14:14.661-07:00

It always is bad to *do* something for non-standard stuff.

But what choice do we have if you still can't kick it out for $$$ issue. (Not literally about $$$)

And to be honest, I would just leave the tag there without using that dirty trick and forget W3C validation since it's only to fool self that your HTML is valid which is not.

Oh, there's no error, it works fine. Was just ...

2011-09-15T18:47:37.002-07:00

Oh, there's no error, it works fine. Was just wondering if anyone thought that was not really an acceptable way to handle the situation. I figure since PHP is rendering my header it isn't hard to just have it not show the “invalid” meta tag when it doesn’t need to be shown.

It should `echo ''? ;p It looks fine to m...

2011-09-15T18:21:15.321-07:00

It should `echo ''? ;p

It looks fine to me (haven't touched PHP for ages), what's the error if any?

PS. didn't expect PHP would ever be involved in this blog.

Anyone see anything wrong with this (PHP-based) fi...

2011-09-15T18:06:15.521-07:00

Anyone see anything wrong with this (PHP-based) fix?

'; } ?>

Thanks for this article, though. I would never wan...

2011-03-30T06:08:36.465-07:00

Thanks for this article, though. I would never want IE8 to act like an earlier IE, and if the tag is not present, IE8 will go edge. Gonna kick this meta out of my head, literally.

There should be a special place in hell for Micros...

2011-03-14T21:08:35.922-07:00

There should be a special place in hell for Microsoft management, when they do such stupid things as this. They only need this tag because IE is so tied to the OS they can't get companies to upgrade. They should all be forced to use IE6 for the rest of there lives. Oh, wait...they still are!

I'm of the same thought, just skip it and take the consequences as they come. Standards should mean something, but won't if we just ignore them every time some idiot software company does.

I knew I would get compliants! http://www.flickr.c...

2011-02-13T12:46:02.272-08:00

I knew I would get compliants! http://www.flickr.com/photos/livibetter/5426285933/

It's planned for a couple of days. It will automatically get back it used to be. :)

The font your using on your site is millions of ti...

2011-02-13T12:43:14.759-08:00

The font your using on your site is millions of times more annoying than IE8....